|
Wind
Power in the
US
Prompted by the oil crises of the
1970s, a wind-power industry
flourished briefly in the United
States. But then world oil prices
dropped, and funding for research into
renewable energy was cut. By the mid
1980s US interest in wind energy as a
large-scale source of energy had
almost disappeared. The development of
wind power at this time suffered not
only from badly designed equipment,
but also from poor long-term planning,
economic projections that were too
optimistic and the difficulty of
finding suitable locations for the
wind turbines.
Only now are technological advances
beginning to offer hope that wind
power will come to be accepted as a
reliable and important source of
electricity. There have been
significant successes in California,
in particular, where wind farms now
have a capacity of 1500 megawatts,
comparable to a large nuclear or
fossil-fuelled power station, and
produce 1.5 per cent of the state's
electricity.
Nevertheless, in the U.S., the image
of wind power is still distorted by
early failures. One of the most
persistent criticisms is that wind
power is not a significant energy
resource. Researchers at the Battelle
Northwest Laboratory, however,
estimate that today wind turbine
technology could supply 20 per cent of
the electrical power the country
needs. As a local resource, wind power
has even greater potential.
Minnesota's energy commission
calculates that a wind farm on one of
the state's south western ridges could
supply almost all that state's
electricity. North Dakota alone has
enough sites suitable for wind farms
to supply more than a third of all
electricity consumed in the
continental US.
The prevailing notion that wind power
is too costly results largely from
early research which focused on
turbines with huge blades that stood
hundreds of metres tall. These
machines were not designed for ease of
production or maintenance, and they
were enormously expensive. Because the
major factors influencing the overall
cost of wind power are the cost of the
turbine and its supporting systems,
including land, as well as operating
and maintenance costs, it is hardly
surprising that it was thought at the
time that wind energy could not be
supplied at a commercially competitive
price. More recent developments such
as those seen on California wind farms
have dramatically changed the economic
picture for wind energy. These
systems, like installations in Hawaii
and several European countries, have
benefited from the economies of scale
that come through standardised
manufacturing and purchasing. The
result has been a dramatic drop in
capital costs: the installed cost of
new wind turbines stood at $1000 per
kilowatt in 1993, down from about
$4000 per kilowatt in 1980, and
continues to fall. Design improvements
and more efficient maintenance
programs for large numbers of turbines
have reduced operating costs as well.
The cost of electricity delivered by
wind farm turbines has decreased from
about 30 cents per kilowatt-hour to
between 7 and 9 cents, which is
generally less than the cost of
electricity from conventional power
stations. Reliability has also
improved dramatically. The latest
turbines run more than 95 per cent of
the time, compared with around 60 per
cent in the early 1980s. Another
misconception is that improved designs
are needed to make wind power
feasible. Out of the numerous wind
turbine designs proposed or built by
inventors or developers, the
propeller-blade type, which is based
on detailed analytical models as well
as extensive experimental data, has
emerged as predominant among the more
than 20,000 machines now in commercial
operation world-wide. Like the
gas-driven turbines that power jet
aircraft, these are sophisticated
pieces of rotating machinery. They are
already highly efficient, and there is
no reason to believe that other
configurations will produce major
benefits. Like other ways of
generating electricity, wind power
does not leave the environment
entirely unharmed. There are many
potential problems, ranging from
interference with telecommunications
to impact on wildlife and natural
habitats. But these effects must be
balanced against those associated with
other forms of electricity generation.
Conventional power stations impose
hidden costs on society, such as the
control of air pollution, the
management of nuclear waste and global
warming. As wind power has been
ignored in the US over the past few
years, expertise and commercial
exploitation in the field have shifted
to Europe. The European Union spends
10 times as much as the US government
on research and development of wind
energy. It estimates that at least 10
per cent of Europe's electrical power
could be supplied by land-based
wind-turbines using current
technology. Indeed, according to the
American Wind Energy Association, an
independent organisation based in
Washington, Denmark, Britain, Spain
and the Netherlands will each surpass
the US in the generating capacity of
wind turbines installed during the
rest of the decade.
Glossary
fossil fuel: coal, oil and natural
gas
kilowatt: 1,000 watts; a watt is a
unit of power
kilowatt-hour: one kilowatt for a
period of one hour
megawatt: one million watts
wind farm: a group of wind turbines
in one location producing a large
amount of electricity
wind turbine: a machine which
produces energy when the wind turns
its blades
Questions 1 - 5
Complete the summary below using words
from the box. Write your
answers in boxes 1-5 on your
answer sheet.
NB There are more words or phrases
than you will need to fill the gaps.
You may use any word or phrase more
than once.
Example
The failure during the late 1970s and
early 1980s of an attempt to establish
a widespread wind power industry in
the United States resulted largely
from the ...(1)... in oil prices
during this period. The industry is
now experiencing a steady ...(2)...
due to improvements in technology and
an increased awareness of the
potential in the power of wind. The
wind turbines that are now being made,
based in part on the ...(3)... of
wide-ranging research in Europe, are
easier to manufacture and maintain
than their predecessors. This has led
wind-turbine makers to be able to
standardise and thus minimise
...(4)... . There has been growing
...(5)... of the importance of wind
power as an energy
source.
|
criticism
|
success
|
design
costs
|
production
costs
|
failure
|
|
stability
|
operating
costs
|
fall
|
growth
|
recognition
|
|
scepticism
|
decisions
|
effects
|
decline
|
results
|
|
Questions 6 - 10
Look at the following issues
(Questions 6-10) and the list of
implications below (A-C). Match
each issue with the
correct implication. Write the
correct letter A-C in boxes 6-10 on
your answer sheet.
N.B. You may use any
letter more than once.
Example
The current price of one
wind-generated kilowatt...
Answer A
Issues
|
6.
|
The recent
installation of
systems taking
advantage of economies
of scale ...
|
|
7.
|
The potential of
meeting one fifth of
current US energy
requirements by wind
power ...
|
|
8.
|
The level of
acceptance of current
wind turbine
technology ...
|
|
9.
|
A comparison of costs
between conventional
and wind power sources
...
|
|
10.
|
The view of wind power
in the European Union
...
|
Implications
|
A
|
provides evidence
against claims that
electricity produced
from wind power is
relatively
expensive.
|
|
B
|
supports claims that
wind power is an
important source of
energy.
|
|
C
|
opposes the view that
wind power technology
requires further
development.
|
|
|
Read the passage below and answer
Questions 1-10.
Daybreak Trips by
Coach
SPRING IS IN THE AIR!
Welcome to our Spring Daybreak
programme which continues the
tradition of offering daytrips and
tours at unbeatable value for money.
All the excursions in this brochure
will be operated by Premier Travel
Services Limited or Millers Coaches;
both companies are part of the CHL
Group, which owns Cambridge's Cambus
fleet.
WE'RE PROUD OF OUR TRADITION
Premier was established in 1936; the
Company now offers the highest
standards of coach travel in today's
competitive operating environment.
Millers has an enviable reputation
stretching back over the past 20
years, offering value for money coach
services at realistic prices. We've
travelled a long way since our early
days of pre-war seaside trips. Now our
fleet of 50 modern coaches (few are
more than five years old) operate
throughout Britain and Europe but
we're pleased to maintain the high
standards of quality and service that
were the trademark of our founders
nearly sixty years ago.
EXCLUSIVE FEATURES
All Daybreak fares (unless
specifically stated otherwise) include
admission charges to the attractions,
shows and exhibits we visit. Many full
day scenic tours are accompanied by a
fully trained English Tourist Board
'Blue Badge' guide or local
experienced driver/guide. Some
Daybreaks include lunch or afternoon
tea. Compare our admission inclusive
fares and see how much you save. The
cheapest is not necessarily the best
and value for money is guaranteed with
Daybreaks. If you compare our bargain
Daybreak fares beware - most of our
competitors do not offer an all
inclusive fare.
SEAT RESERVATIONS
We value the freedom of choice, so you
can choose your seat when you book.
The seat reservation is guaranteed and
remains yours at all times when aboard
the coach.
NO SMOKING COMFORT
With the comfort of our passengers in
mind, coaches on all our Daybreaks are
no smoking throughout. In the
interests of fellow passengers'
comfort, we kindly ask that smokers
observe our 'no smoking' policy. On
scenic tours and longer journeys,
ample refreshment stops are provided
when, of course, smoking is permitted.
YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED
Do I need to book?
Booking in advance is strongly
recommended as all Daybreak tours are
subject to demand. Subject to
availability, stand-by tickets can be
purchased from the driver.
What time does the coach leave?
The coach departs from Cambridge
Drummer Street (Bay 12) at the time
shown. There are many additional
joining points indicated by departure
codes in the brochure. If you are
joining at one of our less popular
joining points, you will be advised of
your pick up time (normally by
telephone) not less than 48 hours
before departure. In this way, we can
minimise the length of pick-up routes
and reduce journey times for the
majority of passengers.
What time do we get back?
An approximate return time is shown
for each excursion. The times shown
serve as a guide, but road conditions
can sometimes cause delay. If your
arrival will be later than advertised,
your driver will try to allow for a
telephone call during the return
journey.
Where can I board the coach?
All the Daybreaks in the brochure
leave from Cambridge Drummer Street
(Bay 12) at the time shown. Many
Daybreaks offer additional pick-ups
for pre-booked passengers within
Cambridge and the surrounding area.
This facility must be requested at the
time of booking.
Questions 1-10
Do the following statements agree
with the information given in the
passage above?
In boxes 1-10 on your answer sheet
write
TRUE
if the statement agrees with the
information
FALSE
if the statement condradicts the
information
NOT GIVEN
if there is no information on
this
1. Millers Coaches owns Cambridge's
Cambus fleet.
2. Premier is an older company than
Millers.
3. Most of the Daybreak coaches are
less than 5 years old.
4. Daybreak fares are more expensive
than most of their competitors.
5. Soft drinks and refreshments are
served on most longer journeys.
6. Smoking is permitted at the rear of
the coach on longer journeys.
7. Tickets must be bought in advance
from an authorised Daybreak
agent.
8. Tickets and seats can be reserved
by phoning the Daybreak
Hotline.
9. Daybreak passengers must join their
coach at Cambridge Drummer
Street.
10. Daybreak cannot guarantee return
times.
|
|
Writing Task 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on
this task.
You rent a house through an
agency. The heating system has stopped
working. You phoned the agency a week
ago but it has still not been
repaired.
Write a letter to the agency.
In your letter
-
introduce
yourself
-
explain the
situation
-
say what action you would
like the agency to take
Write at least 150 words.
You do not need to write your
own address.
Begin your letter as follows:
Dear.......................,
Writing Task 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on
this task.
Write about the following topic:
Some businesses now say
that no one can smoke cigarettes
in any of their offices. Some
governments have banned smoking in
all public places. This is a good
idea but it takes away some of our
freedom.
Do you agree or disagree?
Write at least 250 words.
Give reasons for your answer and
include any relevant examples from
your experience.
|